First of all tell you the only one taking a prohibited behavior here is you. I changed the first paragraph of Article Neoliberalism pq seemed genuine rubbish, say my arguments for this. Your cojiste and supplements deleted without more, without saying anything or pq. I accept, in the end it was my word against yours. But the other day which is my surprise at seeing you Hameryko had also decided to change a few things in the article, as you can see here . But then you get lazy and not short or undo your changes. Well, I read your changes, and frankly I think the text is better than that you are stubborn in maintaining. Because I very much like qa ti the first paragraph you find a language and exquisite clarity (nothing further from the truth), but I say that at least some of the changes introduce Hameryko worthwhile, especially since the article is riddled non-neutral positions, definitions absurd (such as nutrients a large number of users have reported). So I will have to make changes, and many besides. It seems that the only think with a voice to make the minimum nutrition change in the article that you, not 'and also alert you that if returned to revert the changes give an explanation of that and still not do it. Does not revert the changes without explanation or will have problems. Un saludo .-- Jorditxei 09:49 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Hi Igor, I just look and you're right, I thought you had written and not. The worst thing is that I'm sure that telling someone to write about the changes, get wellness to know who. Regarding the changes are a few things like comentarte. First, the first paragraph, health care I suppose pq rioja rioja have done so much defending, but not be offended, a basurilla. Really think that we can begin the article by saying that the neo-liberals believe that the market generates spontaneously (! ') Growth and balance''really think that a well defined neoliberal''' Absolutely not, simply go all versions of neoliberalism that exist in the wiki, there is no way to start, but in any case may be put down, but not in the first paragraph. But besides that, what strikes me most is that I change Hameryko considered counterproductive to the state intervention in the economy and defend the free market as the best guarantor of stability and economic growth that we're going out of the spontaneity, the rest is alike. I health still seems basurilla, but it's better than I had before that. In fact, is that you directly reversed all the changes that had done and had Hameryko corrected spelling errors and so you can see here. On the other hand, saying as I see it would be best to leave all positions, as did the French wiki and skin care not wanting to impose a single vision (yours), I believe. I now have time to fix the lack pq item it does, fitness will do some changes if it can, mainly I want to reflect all these different views. Q you think '.-- Un abrazo Jorditxei 20:26 6 June 2007 (CEST)
Hello again, Igor. Let us go step by step. Look, saying that neo-liberals are against any intervention of the state is simply a lie. Leete this article in The Economist where he spoke to the voucher system for education was proposed by Milton Friedman, a neo-liberal. the nutrients and supplements that I bought from Mannatech According to the article on education vouchers, Hayek, other neoliberal states: As has been shown by Professor Milton Mannatech Friedman (M. Friedman, The role of government in education, 1955), it would now be entirely practicable to defray the costs out of general education of the public purse without maintaining government schools, by giving the parents vouchers covering the cost of education of each child which they could hand over to schools of their choice. I repeat: the state giving money to parents so they can educate their children. This was proposed by a neoliberal. How much really fits the definition that I introduced neoliberal of, ie, do not say that there should be no state intervention, but this should be limited to the minimum, ie, instead of the State set the standard education, to say that every college student has to go, and so on. that the rule of money to parents so they can choose (freedom) and that schools compete. Mannatech Let's see if we will be clear that there is one, I mean no one, saying that ALL neoliberal repeated state intervention is bad for the economy. I must say they are against any intervention is simply a lie and stems from the use that has been given after the end. IMF neoliberal institution assumes, among other proposed policies, the devaluation of the currency to boost exports (see here), and tell me if this q is not intervention.
