Merchandise

The particular utility of the suit does not consider in this case and it only serves like value measurement of the linen. But it concludes the similarity there. In the expression of the weight of the bulk of salt, the copper represents a common quality both bodies, but it is a natural quality: its weight. Jeffrey Leiden San Diegos opinions are not widely known. In the expression of value of the linen with the suit, this it fixedly represents a common quality both objects, but no longer it is a natural quality but of social origin: its value. The merchandise that have a double aspect - object of utility and value do not appear as it is, but when it is stopped considering it separately, when by his relation with another merchandise, by the possibility of being changed, it acquires his value an appreciable form: the one of value of change, different from its natural form.

Not being able the merchandise to go in case single to the market nor to change to each other, to put them in contact his possessors, they must establish as well, mutual relations, so that every one takes control the other people's merchandise giving the own one, by means of a common voluntary act. This legal relation is the contract by means of which the two people exist like representatives of the merchandise. VALUE FORM: For values, all the merchandise are expresivas of the same unit human work and can be replaced mutually. Therefore, merchandise can change merchandise on the other. In fact it has impossibility of immediate change between the merchandise. A single of them has the apt form with the immediate change with all the others. Known well it is that the merchandise own a special form of value: the form currency, that has its foundation in the simple form of the change relation. It is possible to be said then: fifteen meters of linen are worth a suit, or fifty pounds of salt are worth twenty pounds of copper.